N J L M

 
Subscribe Via RSS
  • Home
  • About
    Salient Features Bibliographic Information Abstracting and Indexing Specialties Covered Publisher Journal Policy
  • Issues
    Current Issue Online Ahead of Print Archive Forthcoming issue
  • Editorial
    Editorial Statements Editorial-PeerReview Process Editorial Board Publication Ethics & Malpractice Join us
  • Authors
    Submit an Article Manuscript Instructions Manuscript Assistance Publication Charges Paid Services Early Online Publication Service
  • Reviewers
    Apply as Reviewer Reviewers Acknowledgment
  • Search
    Simple Search Advanced Search
  • Member
    Register Login
  • Contact
  • Subscription
Original article / research
Year: 2026 Month: April Volume: 15 Issue: 2 Page: PC04 - PC06

Metastatic Prostatic Acinar Adenocarcinoma Presenting as a Penile Malignant Tumour: A Case Report

 
Correspondence Gwendolyn Fernandes, Kaustubh Vilasrao Kharche, Amey Rojekar,
Dr. Gwendolyn Fernandes
B2-801, Mahindra Vivante, Near Western Express Metro Station, Andheri (E),
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drgwenfern@yahoo.co.in
:
Penile metastasis from occult prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma is extremely rare and has been described in only a few case reports in the literature. The incidence of metastasis from known prostatic adenocarcinoma to the penis is less than 0.3%. The present case report involves a 72-year-old man presented with a hard penile mass measuring 2×1.5×1 cm for three months. He also reported lower urinary tract symptoms, two or three episodes of haematuria, anorexia, weight loss, and low back pain. A wedge biopsy of the penile mass was initially reported as adenosquamous carcinoma. Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) revealed a heterogeneously enhancing, irregular distal penile lesion measuring 2×1.5×1 cm. Mild prostatomegaly measuring 36 cc was noted. Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) level was 34 ng/mL. Three weeks later, the patient developed acute urinary retention, and the PSA level increased to 54 ng/mL. Total Penectomy and Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy of the prostate were performed. Histopathology revealed prostatic adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 8 (4+4), corresponding to Grade Group 4, while the penectomy specimen showed metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) demonstrated strong positivity for NK3 homeobox 1 (NKX3.1) and PSA, confirming the prostatic origin of the penile lesion. Unlike the present case, most reported patients with penile metastasis from prostatic adenocarcinoma have a known history of prostate cancer diagnosed years before the appearance of penile lesions. Presentation of occult prostatic carcinoma as a primary penile malignant tumour is highly unusual. Thorough clinical evaluation of the prostate in patients with genitourinary malignancies is therefore essential, particularly in the presence of elevated PSA levels.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 
Print
  • Article Utilities

    • Readers Comments (0)
    • Article in PDF
    • Citation Manager
    • Article Statistics
    • Link to PUBMED
    • Print this Article
    • Send to a Friend
    • Go To Issues

      • Current Issue
      • Past Issues
  • Search Articles

    • Simple Search
    • Advance Search
  • Authors Facilities

    • Extensive Author Support
    • Submit Manuscript
    • ONLINE First Facility
    • NJLM Pre Publishing
  • Quick Links

    • REVIEWER
    • ACCESS STATISTICS
  • Users

    • Register
    • Log in
  • Pages

    • About
    • Issues
    • Editorials
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Search
    • Contacts
  • Issues Archives

  • Affiliated Websites

    • JCDR Prepublishing
    • Neonatal Database Home
    • JCDR Neonatal Database download center